ArticleScientific reports2026
An uncertainty-aware vision transformer-BiLSTM Bayesian framework for reliable clinical decision support using chest X-rays.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite recent progress in deep leaning for medical image analysis, there are still issues of reliability, interpretability, and uncertainty estimation that must be addressed for the safe adoption of deep learning into clinical practice. Conventional CNN- based models have achieved excellent accuracy but have also typically shown prediction confidence levels that are too extreme, limiting confidence in very high-stakes diagnostic environments. To tar- get these deficiencies, we propose a suitable competence-based uncertainty-aware infrastructure that combines Vision Transformers, BiLSTM modeling, followed by a Bayesian fusion layer to permit high reliability in disease detection through the use of chest X-rays. The recently proposed Vision Transformer - BiLSTM Bayesian Fusion (ViT - BiLSTM - BF) architecture is trained and eval- uated on two large-scale datasets, the MIMIC-CXR-JPG and PadChest-GR datasets, looking into Pneumonia, Pulmonary Fibrosis, and Pleural Effusion in study depth. Normalization, U-Net (Convo- lutional Neural Network)-based lung segmentation and extensive data augmentation were completed as preprocessing steps. The ViT encoder extracts global spatial features while contextual (temporal) information is maintained by the BiLSTM across the patch embeddings. A Bayesian fusion module that integrates predictive distributions to quantify a priori and a posteriori aleatoric uncertainty and epistemic uncertainty was developed. Performance metrics of accuracy, AUC-ROC, F1 score, Brier Score, ECE and statistical results were used to assess performance. The developed model displayed superior performance over other models achieving accuracy of 95.5% and AUC-ROC of 0.986 and calibration error was extremely small (ECE = 0.028). The Bayesian fusion layer developed produced well calibrated measures of confidence that would be needed to distinguish reliably between high confidence and high risk predictions. In all comparative analyses improvements over others in CNN, DenseNet, Bayesian CNN and the individual ViT alone disgracefully performed. The results of this study demonstrate that by virtue of combining transformer based spatial modelling, temporal feature understanding, and probabilistic fusion, there is a highly reliable and clinically meaningful diagnostic system realised. The framework ultimately offers a real form of solution to the critical issues regarding uncertainty estimation and model reliability and offers potentially interesting possibilities for feasible implementation within at least the development of clinical decision support systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.