ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
GnnDebugger: GNN based error correction in De Bruijn Graphs.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundModern sequencing technologies have enabled the reconstruction of complete mammalian genomes from telomere to telomere. However, scaling this achievement to thousands of species and population-level studies remains a challenge. Key bottlenecks include the low quality of the draft assemblies and the high coverage requirements. In particular, reconstructing complete and accurate sequences of both haplotypes in diploid genomes is especially difficult since the sequencing depth is not always sufficient to properly reconstruct diverged regions. We aim to explore the use of machine learning, specifically graph neural networks, for scalable error correction in De Bruijn Graphs, addressing the limitations of existing heuristic methods in genome assembly.
resultsInspired by the success of neural networks in extracting patterns from the data on a massive scale, we introduce a method for correcting errors in De Bruijn Graphs using Graph Neural Networks. Our model provides a reliable classification of edges into correct and erroneous, especially for diploid genomes with coverage depth 35 and lower. We demonstrate that these predictions can guide the downstream read error correction algorithm and genome assembly, ultimately allowing for more accurate genome assembly.
conclusionsMachine learning methods have the potential to replace heuristic methods commonly used in genome assembly. Learning-based approaches can enhance the performance of existing assemblers in challenging scenarios and facilitate adaptation to newly sequenced species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42304231What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.