ArticleHIV medicine2026
Comparison of four frailty scores to predict adverse health events and mortality in people living with HIV aged 70 years and more (ANRS EP 66 SEPTAVIH study).
Article in HIV medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAs people living with HIV age, frailty has emerged as a determinant of adverse health outcomes. We evaluated four frailty assessment tools in their ability to predict adverse health outcomes and mortality in people living with HIV.
methodsWe enrolled 508 people living with HIV aged ≥70 years. At baseline, frailty was assessed using the Fried frailty phenotype, the FRAIL scale, the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) score and the French Health Authority (HAS) questionnaire. The primary outcome was adverse health events (serious or recurrent falls, emergency department visits, unscheduled hospitalizations, nursing home admission or death) over 36 months. Log-binomial regression models estimated relative risks (RRs) for adverse outcomes in the 355 participants with a 36 months visit follow-up or death. Cox proportional hazards models assessed mortality in all enrolled people living with HIV.
resultsOver 36 months, 204 participants (40.2%) experienced our primary outcome, including 40 deaths. Frailty was associated with a higher risk of adverse outcomes with all tools: Fried phenotype [RR 1.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-1.86], FRAIL scale (RR 1.88, 95% CI 1.54-2.29), SOF score (RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.05-2.00) and HAS questionnaire (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.40-1.92). All tools were strongly associated with mortality, except the SOF score.
conclusionsIn people living with HIV aged ≥70 years, all four frailty tools predicted adverse health outcomes, whilst mortality was best predicted by the Fried phenotype, FRAIL scale and HAS questionnaire. Simple, questionnaire-based tools such as the FRAIL scale and the HAS questionnaire offer practical and effective frailty screening tools in routine HIV care for older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.