ArticleNeurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.)
Modulation of posterior insula selectively enhances nociceptive sensory gating in healthy humans.
Article in Neurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sensory gating - the brains ability to filter out repetitive sensory input - is essential for preventing sensory overload. Impaired gating is frequently observed in nociplastic and other chronic overlapping pain conditions, yet the specific brain regions supporting this inhibitory process in human remains unclear. Neuroimaging studies examining pain processing implicate the dorsal anterior insula (dAI), posterior insula (PI), and anterior mid-cingulate cortex (aMCC), but their deeper locations limit direct mechanistic testing using conventional non-invasive techniques. Here, we leveraged low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU), a novel non-invasive neuromodulation method with high depth-penetration and millimeter resolution, to examine the contributions of the dAI, PI, and aMCC to sensory gating of nociceptive stimuli. Twelve healthy adults completed four counterbalanced visits of a paired-pulse contact heat evoked potential (CHEP) paradigm while receiving LIFU targeted to each region or an active sham. Using surface electroencephalography (EEG), placed at site Cz, we quantified the peak-to-peak (P2P) amplitude of the cortical response to the first stimulus (S1), the second stimulus (S2), and used the ratio of the response to each stimulus (S2/S1 ratio) as an index of sensory gating. Subjective ratings of pain intensity to the second stimulus were also recorded. Results demonstrated that all subjects displayed sensory gating at baseline and that LIFU produced region-specific effects. Both PI and aMCC neuromodulation reduced subjective pain ratings and significantly decreased S2 amplitude relative to sham, whereas LIFU to AI had no effect. Critically, only PI neuromodulation enhanced sensory gating by reducing the S2/S1 ratio. These findings identify the PI as a key contributor to gating of repetitive nociceptive input and a promising neuromodulation target for remediating sensory gating deficits in nociplastic pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.