Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42305258›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2026

Deep Learning Morphometric Analysis on Protocol Biopsies Predicts Future Graft Function.

Mira Ben Haberou, Patrick Bard, Jean-Baptiste Gibier, Hugo Gabriel Pereira De Almeida, Jamal Bamoulid, Mehdi Maanaoui, Alice Koenig, Maud Rabeyrin, Alexia Gazeu, Sami Ezzahid and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Mira Ben HaberouDepartment of Nephrology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Dijon, Dijon, France.
Patrick BardSkinet Team, Laboratoire d'Étude de l'Apprentissage et du Développement-French National Centre for Scientific Research (LEAD-CNRS), UMR 5022, Université de Bourgogne Europe, Dijon, France.
Jean-Baptiste GibierDepartment of Pathology, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Hugo Gabriel Pereira De AlmeidaSkinet Team, Laboratoire d'Étude de l'Apprentissage et du Développement-French National Centre for Scientific Research (LEAD-CNRS), UMR 5022, Université de Bourgogne Europe, Dijon, France.
Jamal BamoulidDepartment of Nephrology, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France.
Mehdi MaanaouiDepartment of Nephrology, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Alice KoenigDepartment of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Hospice Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Maud RabeyrinDepartment of Pathology, Hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Alexia GazeuDepartment of Pathology, Hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Sami EzzahidSkinet Team, Laboratoire d'Étude de l'Apprentissage et du Développement-French National Centre for Scientific Research (LEAD-CNRS), UMR 5022, Université de Bourgogne Europe, Dijon, France.
Fanny BuronDepartment of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Hospice Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Cécile PicardDepartment of Pathology, Hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Cécile CourivaudDepartment of Nephrology, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France.
Sophie Adrian FelixDepartment of Pathology, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France.
Michel PaindavoineSkinet Team, Laboratoire d'Étude de l'Apprentissage et du Développement-French National Centre for Scientific Research (LEAD-CNRS), UMR 5022, Université de Bourgogne Europe, Dijon, France.
Claire TinelDepartment of Nephrology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Dijon, Dijon, France.
Rémi LenainDepartment of Nephrology, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Laurent MartinDepartment of Pathology, CHU Dijon, Dijon, France.
Georges TarrisDepartment of Pathology, CHU Dijon, Dijon, France.
Manon AnsartSkinet Team, Laboratoire d'Étude de l'Apprentissage et du Développement-French National Centre for Scientific Research (LEAD-CNRS), UMR 5022, Université de Bourgogne Europe, Dijon, France.
Mathieu LegendreDepartment of Nephrology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Dijon, Dijon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The predictive value of Banff classification in protocol transplant biopsies without specific lesions is limited. Morphometry provides precise data on microstructures, surpassing semiquantitative scores but is time-consuming. This study evaluates whether automated morphometric analysis with deep learning can predict glomerular filtration rate at 3 years using machine learning. Methods: This retrospective study included kidney transplant recipients who underwent protocol biopsy without specific lesion. The models were trained and tested on the training/test cohort, with external validation on the application cohort. Eight deep learning algorithms extracted 23 morphometric parameters from whole-slide images (WSI). Ten machine learning models were tested for 3 years glomerular filtration rates prediction. Results: A total of 367 patients were included. The means of the 3-year estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) were 53 ± 23 and 53 ± 22 ml/min per 1.73 m Conclusion: Integrating automated morphometric analyses into machine learning models may help predict glomerular filtration rates 3 years after protocol biopsies.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningkidney biopsymorphometryprognosistransplantation

Identifiers

PMID42305258
PMCPMC13265662

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.