ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2026
Patient-centred communication in primary care: are general practitioners aware of their strengths and areas for improvement?
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Communication and interpersonal skills are fundamental to effective medical practice and can significantly influence adherence to medical recommendations and treatment outcomes. This study aimed to identify both strengths and areas requiring support in interpersonal skills among general practitioners in Poland. Material and methods: The study was conducted using the computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) method with a sample of 600 general practitioners working in public and private primary care clinics in Poland. The Interpersonal Communication Skills Inventory (Learning Dynamics, 2002) was used to assess communication skills. Results: The average score obtained by respondents was 72 out of a possible 120 points. Analysis of specific communication skill domains indicated that the strongest area was Sending Clear Messages (M = 21.19, SD = 5.01). However, Listening (M = 16.68, SD = 4.45) and Giving and Receiving Feedback (M = 16.87, SD = 5.12) were identified as areas requiring improvement. Variations in communication skill levels were associated with factors such as gender, age, years of professional experience, self-assessed communication skills, perceived adequacy of consultation time, perceived need for practical communication training and prior participation in doctor-patient communication workshops. The findings indicate that the surveyed general practitioners may have an insufficient awareness of their own communication skills. Conclusions: The communication skills of Polish general practitioners require particular attention, especially in the areas of Listening and Giving and Receiving Feedback. No overall improvement in communication skills was observed with increasing professional experience, suggesting that targeted training may be necessary to enhance them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.