Evidence mapPaperPMID 42305413Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2026

Continuous positive airway pressure in breast cancer radiotherapy: Protocol of a prospective clinical trial.

A Van der Vorst, J Verhoeven, A Baten, H Janssen, L Van Bavel, L Delombaerde, T Reynders, M Cooreman, A Laenen, M Lambrecht and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07373782 (Reducing Cardiac Radiation Dose in Continuous Positive Airway Pressure), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07373782 phase2 / phase3recruitingnot on this map

Reducing Cardiac Radiation Dose in Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Assisted Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer: a Prospective Non-Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenRan2025 to 2027Enrolled53ConditionsBreast Cancer Early Stage Breast Cancer (Stage 1-3)ArmsContinuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

A Van der VorstLaboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
J VerhoevenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
A BatenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
H JanssenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
L Van BavelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
L DelombaerdeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
T ReyndersDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
M CooremanDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
A LaenenDepartment of Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
M LambrechtLaboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Aelst L VanDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
C WeltensLaboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Radiotherapy (RT) improves survival and local control after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer (BC) but can also cause toxicity. Preliminary studies suggest that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) reduces organ-at-risk (OAR) doses in left-sided BC RT. This prospective trial evaluates whether CPAP reduces OAR doses in a larger patient cohort, including both left and right-sided cases, and identifies which patients benefit most. Furthermore, this study investigates the feasibility of CPAP in BC RT, by evaluating patient comfort, radiation time, accuracy and reproducibility. Methods: BC patients requiring BCS and RT are prospectively enrolled -left-sided cases with or without regional nodal irradiation (RNI), or right-sided cases requiring RNI. Each patient undergoes an additional CT simulation with CPAP-free breathing (FB) for right-sided cases and deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) for left-sided cases. Left-sided patients unable to perform DIBH or ≥ 70 years old are evaluated in FB. Two RT plans (with and without CPAP) are compared. If CPAP reduces mean heart or contralateral breast dose by ≥0.5 Gy, or mean lung dose by ≥1 Gy, treatment is delivered with CPAP. Patient comfort is assessed through surveys. Sample size calculations indicated that 53 patients are required to detect a ≥0.5 Gy reduction in mean heart dose. Discussion: This is the first large, prospective study to evaluate CPAP in both left- and right-sided BC patients, aiming to demonstrate OAR dose reductions and assess feasibility. The final aim is to provide patient-selection models and guidelines for clinical implementation. Trial registration: The study is registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT07373782).

Indexed as

Breast cancerContinuous positive airway pressureDosimetryFeasibilityRadiation therapyToxicity

Identifiers

PMID42305413
PMCPMC13266125

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.