ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2026
Continuous positive airway pressure in breast cancer radiotherapy: Protocol of a prospective clinical trial.
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07373782 (Reducing Cardiac Radiation Dose in Continuous Positive Airway Pressure), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Reducing Cardiac Radiation Dose in Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Assisted Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer: a Prospective Non-Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radiotherapy (RT) improves survival and local control after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer (BC) but can also cause toxicity. Preliminary studies suggest that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) reduces organ-at-risk (OAR) doses in left-sided BC RT. This prospective trial evaluates whether CPAP reduces OAR doses in a larger patient cohort, including both left and right-sided cases, and identifies which patients benefit most. Furthermore, this study investigates the feasibility of CPAP in BC RT, by evaluating patient comfort, radiation time, accuracy and reproducibility. Methods: BC patients requiring BCS and RT are prospectively enrolled -left-sided cases with or without regional nodal irradiation (RNI), or right-sided cases requiring RNI. Each patient undergoes an additional CT simulation with CPAP-free breathing (FB) for right-sided cases and deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) for left-sided cases. Left-sided patients unable to perform DIBH or ≥ 70 years old are evaluated in FB. Two RT plans (with and without CPAP) are compared. If CPAP reduces mean heart or contralateral breast dose by ≥0.5 Gy, or mean lung dose by ≥1 Gy, treatment is delivered with CPAP. Patient comfort is assessed through surveys. Sample size calculations indicated that 53 patients are required to detect a ≥0.5 Gy reduction in mean heart dose. Discussion: This is the first large, prospective study to evaluate CPAP in both left- and right-sided BC patients, aiming to demonstrate OAR dose reductions and assess feasibility. The final aim is to provide patient-selection models and guidelines for clinical implementation. Trial registration: The study is registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT07373782).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.