ArticleTranslational cancer research2026
Predictive modelling of duodenal stump leakage after gastric cancer and long-term oncological outcomes.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Duodenal stump leakage (DSL) is a significant postoperative complication of gastric cancer that has a detrimental impact on patient prognosis. However, there is currently no established DSL prediction model. Furthermore, the long-term prognostic implications of DSL in gastric cancer patients remain unclear. The aim of this study was to construct a risk prediction model for DSL to guide clinical decision-making and assess the long-term prognosis of DSL. Methods: A retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics from 2,511 patients was conducted to develop and evaluate a DSL prediction model using multiple machine learning techniques. These included least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbor, and logistic regression (LR) for clinical feature selection. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to assess the long-term prognostic significance of DSL in gastric cancer. Results: In the training cohort, the RF and SVM models achieved areas under the curve (AUCs) of 1.000 and 1.000, respectively, while in the test cohort, their AUCs were 0.944 and 0.895. The LR model showed greater stability in the test cohort (AUC 0.954). The three most important risk factors were preoperative albumin, distal margin distance, and postoperative day 4 C-reactive protein (CRP). DSL did not significantly affect overall survival (OS) (P=0.13) but was associated with reduced recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P=0.03). Conclusions: The construction of DSL risk prediction models with RF can facilitate more effective clinical management. Furthermore, our findings indicate that DSL affects RFS after gastric cancer surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.