ArticleOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland)2026
A clinically concordant vulvar cancer patient-derived xenograft model retaining primary molecular signature for preclinical drug sensitivity assessment.
Article in Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Establish and validate a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model for vulvar cancer (VC). Evaluate the efficacy of commonly used clinical drugs both Methods: Fresh primary vulvar cancer tumor tissues were then subcutaneously implanted into the scapular regions of immunodeficient mice, with tumor formation monitored and recorded in these mice. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was performed to observe and compare the histopathological features of the primary and xenograft tumors, while immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was used to assess the consistency of protein expression profiles between the primary and xenograft tumors. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods were employed to confirm the human origin of the xenograft tumors. Finally, the sensitivity of guideline-recommended chemotherapy drugs was evaluated using both HDST and Results: Tumor tissue from a primary vulvar squamous cell carcinoma patient was successfully transplanted into the subcutaneous region of mice and stably passed to the fourth generation. H&E staining results showed that the PDX model retained the atypia and original histological features of the primary tumor cells. IHC staining further confirmed that the protein expression profile of the xenograft tumors in the PDX model was consistent with that of the primary tumor. PCR humanization identification confirmed that the tumor tissues were of human origin. HDST drug screening results, combined with Conclusions: We have successfully established a vulvar cancer PDX model. This model retains the fundamental molecular characteristics of the primary human vulvar cancer tumor, thus offering an advantageous approach for preclinical assessment of novel therapies and investigation into the disease's pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.