ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2026
[An overview of home care for patients with chronic diseases in Latin America: A scoping reviewPanorama da atenção domiciliar para pacientes com doenças crônicas na América Latina: revisão de escopo].
Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To review the available evidence on home care services for older adults with chronic conditions in Latin America and to describe the characteristics of care models and reported outcomes. Method: Scoping review conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Studies published through March 2025 that addressed at least one of the following dimensions were included: a) description of the service; b) financial results; c) patient-reported outcomes; and d) clinical outcomes. The search was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, LILACS, REDALyc, Epistemonikos, Web of Science, and SciELO. Data selection and extraction were performed by two independent reviewers and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. The protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework. Results: Of the 7312 records identified, 38 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most described characteristics of the services and populations; 5 assessed costs, 10 reported patient-centered outcomes, and 14 reported clinical outcomes, including hospitalizations and complications. Most studies used descriptive designs, with considerable heterogeneity. Conclusion: It is suggested that home care services could help to improve efficiency, continuity of care, and patient experience. However, the evidence is limited and inconsistent, with little comparative evaluation. Multicenter studies, cost-effectiveness analyses, and standardized outcome measurement are needed to guide decision-making and the development of public policies in the Region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.