ArticleAsian biomedicine : research, reviews and news2026
Favipiravir treatment in Thai children with COVID-19: effectiveness, safety, and modeling drug exposure.
Article in Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite widespread favipiravir (FPV) use for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Thailand, pediatric clinical evidence remains limited. Objectives: This study evaluated FPV's effectiveness and safety for treating COVID-19 in children and adolescents. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study included patients ≤18 years old testing COVID-19 positive between July 2021 and December 2022 across 11 hospitals in Thailand. Patients were divided into those with and without chest X-ray-confirmed pneumonia. Patients who received FPV were treated with 35 mg/kg twice daily on day 1 and 15 mg/kg twice daily on days 2-5. Pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling estimated plasma exposure in children using scaled Thai adult data. Results: Of 2,999 patients, 68.2% had no pneumonia. FPV recipients (n = 1,886) were mostly <5 years old, had a fever, infected during the Omicron wave, had lower mean cycle threshold (Ct) values of SARS-CoV-2 gene at diagnosis, and hospitalized compared to non-recipients. FPV treatment significantly shortened fever duration and hospitalization in both pneumonia and non-pneumonia patients. For non-pneumonia patients, being <5 years old, and receiving FPV were associated with complete recovery at discharge. For pneumonia patients, a history of preterm birth, pulmonary disease, and ICU admission reduced the likelihood of complete recovery at discharge. No serious adverse events were reported. PK models predicted that FPV plasma trough concentrations in children ≥10 kg were above efficacy targets. Conclusions: Early FPV treatment shortened fever duration and hospital stays in children and adolescents with COVID-19, promoting clinical recovery in both pneumonia and non-pneumonia cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.