Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42306365›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Chemical Peels in Skin of Color: A Scoping Review of Safety, Efficacy, and Practice Patterns.

Emily Garelick, Priya Pohani, Anjiya Aswani, Sophia Khan, Saloni Chadha, Tej Patel, Mohamad Bilal Kebbe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily GarelickDermatology, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
Priya PohaniDermatology, Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dothan, USA.
Anjiya AswaniInternal Medicine, Ross University School of Medicine, Bridgetown, BRB.
Sophia KhanDermatology, Washington University of Health and Science, San Pedro, BLZ.
Saloni ChadhaMedicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
Tej PatelMedicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
Mohamad Bilal KebbeDermatology, Okan University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, TUR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical peels are widely used for both cosmetic and medical dermatologic indications, but their application in individuals with skin of color (Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI) requires caution due to the increased risk of pigmentary complications. To assess their safety and efficacy, a comprehensive PubMed review was conducted, identifying 473 studies, seven of which met the inclusion criteria, specifically those articles documenting chemical peels in skin of color populations and reported primary outcomes. Among the seven included studies, five evaluated peels for the treatment of acne and acne scarring, all reporting positive outcomes with minimal adverse effects. One study addressed lichen planus pigmentosus, showing significant clinical improvement, and one highlighted chemical burns resulting from improper use. Overall, superficial peels such as glycolic and salicylic acid show promise for acne and pigmentary disorders with good safety profiles. However, research is limited by small sample sizes, short follow-ups, and underrepresentation of Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI. Further research is needed to establish standardized protocols, assess deeper peels, and guide equitable, evidence-based care.

Indexed as

chemical peelsfitzpatrick skin phototypes iv-viglycolic acidskin of colortrichloroacetic acid

Identifiers

PMID42306365
PMCPMC13266789

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.