ArticlePloS one2026
A semantic segmentation model to predict subcellular glycogen localization using transmission electron microscopy images.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is the gold standard for assessing subcellular glycogen localization in skeletal muscle fibres, but conventional manual analysis is extremely time-consuming and limits large-scale studies. Here, we developed and validated a deep learning-based semantic segmentation approach to automate quantification of glycogen particles across defined subcellular compartments in human skeletal muscle. Skeletal muscle biopsies were obtained from seven healthy men under conditions of normal, depleted, and supercompensated glycogen content. TEM images were acquired from myofibrillar and subsarcolemmal regions and manually annotated to train two complementary attention U-Net models: a region model identifying subcellular structures (intermyofibrillar space, intramyofibrillar regions including A-band, I-band and Z-disc, and mitochondria) and a glycogen model detecting individual glycogen particles. Combining the two models enabled estimation of compartment-specific glycogen areal densities. The model's outcome was evaluated against manual point-counting. At the fibre level, estimates based on 10-12 images per region achieved biases below 15% and coefficient of variation below 26% for all compartments. Importantly, model-derived total glycogen volume density showed strong concordance with biochemically determined muscle glycogen content across biopsies. In conclusion, this validated semantic segmentation workflow provides an objective and highly time-efficient tool for quantifying subcellular glycogen distribution in skeletal muscle. The model substantially reduces analysis time and enables high-throughput investigations of compartmentalized glycogen metabolism, with model weights and code made openly available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.