ReviewObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2026
The Influence of Relationships Within Behavioral Weight Management Interventions: An Overview.
Review in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Behavioral weight management interventions have been shown to be effective for weight loss. However, a common challenge is difficulty in engaging with the public, participants, or service-users across the research continuum. User-provider relationships are key in weight management and may be integral to continuing engagement. This overview aimed to understand the nature of relationships within behavioral weight management interventions delivered in research studies and healthcare settings, how these may influence retention as well as potential relationship barriers and facilitators. Six databases were searched; 20 reviews (27 reports) were included. Most reviews investigated weight management delivered face-to-face by healthcare professionals across different settings. The Theoretical Domains Framework guided the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative data regarding user-provider relationships. GRADE CER-Qual was used to assess the confidence of findings. Thirty-eight findings were categorized to domains in the framework in addition to two cross-cutting themes. High confidence evidence demonstrated that the domains of knowledge, skills, social/professional role or identity, environmental context and resources, and behavioral regulation provided challenges as well as enabling relationships in weight management. The central domain underpinning the influence of relationships on retention was social influences, with weight stigma a pervasive theme recurring across domains. Application of a theoretical lens to consider cognitive, affective, social, and environmental influences helped better understand user-provider relationships as a potential mechanism through which retention-related behaviors in weight management can be driven or deterred. This overview suggests that improving user-provider relationships should be considered a useful retention strategy in weight management programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.