ArticleJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology2026
Heterologous expression of lipase gene in Cereibacter sphaeroides 2.4.1 driven by an anaerobic Photosynthesis-Inducible promoter.
Article in Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cereibacter sphaeroides 2.4.1, a purple non-sulfur bacterium, is a metabolically versatile organism capable of shifting between aerobic respiration and anaerobic photoheterotrophy. This adaptability makes it an attractive platform for sustainable biocatalysis that harnesses solar energy to drive high-energy biochemical reactions. In this study, we evaluated C. sphaeroides as a heterologous expression host for the thermostable T1.2RQ lipase from Geobacillus stearothermophilus T1.2 using the broad-host-range vector pRK415. To exploit light-responsive regulation, expression driven by the anaerobic/microaerobic-inducible puf promoter was compared with that driven by the constitutive lac promoter. Under anaerobic conditions, puf-driven expression (0.333 ± 0.044 U/mg) exceeded lac-driven expression (0.108 ± 0.01 U/mg), whereas under aerobic conditions the lac promoter yielded higher activity (0.542 ± 0.001 U/mg) than the puf promoter (0.247 ± 0.010 U/mg). These results demonstrate that the use of an indigenous promoter does not necessarily correlate with proportional increases in enzymatic output. SDS-PAGE and zymogram analyses confirmed expression of the recombinant enzyme, showing a consistent molecular mass of ∼ 43 kDa. The lipase exhibited optimal activity at 65°C and retained ∼ 70% activity after 3 h at 50°C. Maximum activity occurred at pH 10.0, and the enzyme remained stable between pH 7.0-10.0, maintaining > 75% residual activity after 180 min. Substrate specificity assays revealed activity toward multiple p-nitrophenyl esters, with a preference for short-chain substrates, particularly pNP butyrate. Collectively, these findings identify the puf promoter as a promising regulatory element for light-driven protein expression in C. sphaeroides. Coupling enzyme production to photosynthetic metabolism provides a low-energy strategy for industrial biocatalysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.