Evidence mapPaperPMID 42310042Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2026

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of exercise in older adults with sarcopenia.

Maria Clara Fagundes Lucio, Raphael Gonçalves de Oliveira, Laura Isabel Martins de Almeida, Laís Campos de Oliveira

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria Clara Fagundes LucioPostgraduate Program in Human Movement Sciences, Universidade Estadual Do Norte Do Paraná, Jacarezinho, Paraná, Brazil.
Raphael Gonçalves de OliveiraPostgraduate Program in Human Movement Sciences, Universidade Estadual Do Norte Do Paraná, Jacarezinho, Paraná, Brazil.
Laura Isabel Martins de AlmeidaPostgraduate Program in Human Movement Sciences, Universidade Estadual Do Norte Do Paraná, Jacarezinho, Paraná, Brazil.
Laís Campos de OliveiraPostgraduate Program in Human Movement Sciences, Universidade Estadual Do Norte Do Paraná, Jacarezinho, Paraná, Brazil. oliveiralc@uenp.edu.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aging is associated with progressive physiological changes that impair physical functioning and quality of life (QoL), as exemplified by sarcopenia, a condition characterized by the loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength that increases the risk of falls, dependency, and mortality. Although physical exercise is widely recognized as an effective intervention, the literature remains heterogeneous with respect to the most appropriate modalities for this population. This study aimed to synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of physical exercise on skeletal muscle mass, muscle strength, physical performance, QoL, and mortality in older adults with sarcopenia. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, CINAHL, PEDro, SPORTDiscus, and LILACS databases, with no restrictions on language or publication date, up to May 26, 2025. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the PEDro scale. Meta-analyses were performed using standardized mean difference or mean difference for post-intervention data, and the certainty of evidence was graded according to the GRADE approach. Sensitivity analyses evaluated the impact of studies with a high risk of bias, and subgroup analyses compared different exercise modalities and diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia. Following systematic screening, 72 studies were included, of which 36 were classified as having a low risk of bias. Physical exercise was superior to control conditions in improving skeletal muscle mass (small effect size), muscle strength, and physical performance (moderate effect size), with no significant effects on QoL. Resistance exercise was more effective than aerobic exercise for increasing skeletal muscle mass (large effect size). The combination of physical exercise and nutritional supplementation yielded greater benefits than either intervention alone for muscle mass and strength and, in sensitivity analyses, also for physical performance. A meta-analysis for mortality was not performed, as only one RCT reported this outcome, representing very limited evidence that precludes any meaningful pooled estimate or definitive conclusions regarding the effects of exercise on mortality in this population. Subgroup analyses stratified by diagnostic criteria demonstrated overall consistent effects across the different sarcopenia definitions. The certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Physical exercise should be considered a first-line intervention for older adults with sarcopenia, given its potential to improve skeletal muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance, supported by moderate-certainty evidence. The effects of exercise combined with nutritional supplementation and the comparative effectiveness of different exercise modalities remain uncertain, as the certainty of evidence for these analyses was low to very low, and future studies are likely to modify these conclusions.

Indexed as

ExerciseExercise TherapySarcopeniaAgedHumansMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAgingOlder adultsPhysical exerciseSarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID42310042
PMCPMC13372821

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.