Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42310124›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Toward clinically relevant automated corneal biomanufacturing with human-derived FBS alternatives.

Alexandre Taoum, Julia S Oster, Ole Thaden, Andrea Frank, Meng Wang, Mario Wisbar, Matthias Fuest, Friederike Dehli, Daniela F Duarte Campos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alexandre TaoumBioprinting & Tissue Engineering Group, Center for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany. a.taoum@zmbh.uni-heidelberg.de.
Julia S OsterBioprinting & Tissue Engineering Group, Center for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ole ThadenBioprinting & Tissue Engineering Group, Center for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Andrea FrankBioprinting & Tissue Engineering Group, Center for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Meng WangBioprinting & Tissue Engineering Group, Center for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mario WisbarBioprinting & Tissue Engineering Group, Center for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias FuestDepartment of Ophthalmology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Friederike DehliBioprinting & Tissue Engineering Group, Center for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Daniela F Duarte CamposBioprinting & Tissue Engineering Group, Center for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany. dcampos@uni-heidelberg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The replacement of animal-derived components from cell culture protocols is essential for the development of human-compatible and clinically translatable systems. Fetal bovine serum (FBS) is still widely used for cell expansion, although its xenogeneic origin and batch variability limit regulatory compliance. In this study, human platelet lysate (hPL) and human serum (HS) were assessed as low-serum (2%) alternatives to FBS during the subculture phase of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSC) prior to keratocyte differentiation for corneal tissue engineering. BM-MSC were gradually adapted over four days to 2% FBS, hPL, or HS, maintained for seven days, and then transferred to serum-free keratocyte differentiation medium for 14 days in either two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) cultures in 30 wt% riboflavin-arginine-triggered gelatin methacryloyl (RA-GelMA) hydrogels crosslinked under visible blue light. To demonstrate the applicability of this approach in corneal tissue engineering, differentiation was evaluated by immunofluorescence and quantitative PCR in 2D cultures, and by immunofluorescence in 3D cultures. Both hPL and HS maintained metabolic activity, supported keratocyte-associated marker expression, and suppressed α-SMA, performing comparably to FBS, thereby supporting their use as clinically compliant, human-derived alternatives for xeno-reduced corneal biomanufacturing.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesCorneaMesenchymal Stem CellsSerumTissue EngineeringAnimalsBlood PlateletsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCorneal KeratocytesCulture MediaCulture Media, Serum-FreeHumansHydrogelsCulture MediaCulture Media, Serum-FreeHydrogelsCorneal tissue engineeringFBS alternativesHuman platelet lysateHuman serumKeratocyte differentiationXeno-reduced culture systems

Identifiers

PMID42310124
PMCPMC13276165

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.