ArticleClinical rheumatology2026
Disproportionality analysis of pyoderma gangrenosum reporting to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System in association with antirheumatic biologics.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral cases of pyoderma gangrenosum, a rare neutrophilic dermatosis, have been reported in patients initiating biological therapies for rheumatic health conditions. Despite this, systematic analysis across available therapies is lacking. This study investigated pyoderma gangrenosum reporting in association with antirheumatic biologics to the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).
methodsReports from FAERS (2016-second quarter of 2025) were complied, deduplicated, and standardized. Pyoderma gangrenosum cases were classified according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. Proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to estimate disproportionality for 20 individual antirheumatic biologics from nine pharmacologic classes.
resultsDuring the study period, 13,284,367 adverse events were reported to FAERS, including 1316 pyoderma gangrenosum cases; 868 (65.96%) cases identified an antirheumatic biologic as the primary suspect product. Positive disproportionality signals were detected for 11 study biologics belonging to six pharmacologic classes. All four interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors exhibited disproportionate pyoderma gangrenosum reporting, with brodalumab (PRR 23.02; 95% CI 8.64-61.36) and bimekizumab (PRR 9.10; 95% CI 4.08-20.29) demonstrating the strongest signals. Positive disproportionality signals were also observed among biologics targeting tumor necrosis factor alpha, IL-6, IL-12/23, IL-23, and CD20. Similar results were obtained in sensitivity analyses.
conclusionDespite its limitations, this hypothesis-generating analysis identified significantly disproportionate pyoderma gangrenosum reporting with several antirheumatic biologics. Clinicians should remain vigilant for these paradoxical reactions in patients undergoing biologic treatment for rheumatic conditions. Key points • Pyoderma gangrenosum has been reported in patients undergoing treatment with biologics for rheumatic indications. • This study analyzed spontaneous postmarketing pyoderma gangrenosum reporting in association with 20 antirheumatic biologics. • Pyoderma gangrenosum disproportionality signals were identified for 11 biologics targeting interleukin (IL)-6, IL-17, IL-12/23, IL-23, CD20, and tumor necrosis factor alpha.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42310248What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.