ArticleScientific reports2026
Translational difficulties in establishing a pharmacologically induced neurovascular uncoupling model in rats.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurovascular uncoupling (NVU) contributes to neurological disorders like Alzheimer's disease. While a mouse NVU model exists, a reliable rat model critical for cognitive research remains underdeveloped. To address this methodological gap, we investigated a pharmacological approach in rats using the same drugs (N-(methylsulfonyl)-2-(2-propynyloxy)-benzenehexanamide (MS-PPOH), L-NG-nitroarginine methyl ester (L-NAME), indomethacin) that proved to be efficacious in mice. The compounds were formulated as a cocktail solution and administered intraperitoneally for 13 days to aged, cognitively experienced Long-Evans rats. Our goal was to induce NVU while minimizing adverse systemic effects seen previously (e.g., hypertension, intestinal ulceration). The treatment induced only a modest (28%, non-significant) reduction in cerebral hyperaemia, with decreased prostaglandin E2 levels but unchanged 11,12-epoxyeicosatrienoic acid concentration in the brain. Cognitive effects were limited-transient impairment in the 5-choice task but no changes in spontaneous alternation, visual discrimination, cooperation, or motor learning. Significant adverse effects emerged: reduced food intake, weight loss, gastrointestinal malaise, and moderate renal toxicity. Our findings specifically highlight the challenges of achieving sufficient and symptomatically apparent NVU while minimizing systemic toxicity. While partial NVU occurred, this polypharmacy approach had major limitations. A reliable, industrially applicable rat NVU model remains urgently needed to accelerate antidementia drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.