ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2026
Comparative bleeding risk between angiotensin II receptor blockers with high versus low P-glycoprotein inhibitory activity in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving direct oral anticoagulants.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are frequently co-prescribed with angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) in atrial fibrillation (AF). Because ARBs differ in P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibition, bleeding risk may vary. We compared major bleeding when DOACs were combined with telmisartan (high P-gp inhibition) versus olmesartan (low P-gp inhibition). We conducted a nationwide cohort study from 2016-2023 in Korea. We identified AF patients who started a DOAC with telmisartan or olmesartan. The primary outcome was a composite of intracranial hemorrhage and gastrointestinal bleeding. Secondary outcomes included each component of the primary outcome and ischemic stroke. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Among DOAC-treated patients with AF, 27,851 and 20,010 patients were included in the telmisartan and olmesartan groups, respectively. The incidence rates of the primary outcome were 9.13 per 1000 person-years in the telmisartan group and 6.69 in the olmesartan group (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.11-1.65). Concomitant use of telmisartan was associated with a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (1.49, 1.17-1.89), but not with intracranial hemorrhage (1.06, 0.74-1.54) or ischemic stroke (0.94, 0.78-1.14). Among patients with AF using DOACs, concomitant use of ARBs with high P-gp inhibitory activity was associated with a significantly higher risk of major bleeding and gastrointestinal bleeding compared-ARBs with low P-gp inhibitory activity. These findings suggest that differences in P-gp inhibitory activity among ARBs may influence bleeding risk in clinical practice when co-administered with DOACs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.