Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42310771›Full record

ReviewBioData mining2026

Navigating the uncharted: AI-driven advances in protein structure, dynamics, interactions and ligand interactions for understudied families.

Shivani Singh, Ruhani Singh, Sunita Sharma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioData mining, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shivani SinghSharda School of Bio-Science & Technology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ruhani SinghSharda School of Bio-Science & Technology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sunita SharmaSharda School of Bio-Science & Technology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India. sunita.sharma@sharda.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structural and functional characterization of lesser-known protein families remains a major challenge in modern computational biology. Recent breakthroughs in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have rapidly advanced these fields. This is particularly evident in overcoming the limitations of traditional modelling approaches, such as classical homology modelling and ab initio folding methods. This review traces the evolution of conventional methods to cutting-edge deep learning frameworks, such as AlphaFold2, RoseTTAFold, and transformer-based architectures. We explore how these AI-driven tools achieve near-experimental accuracy in structure prediction, model protein dynamics, and intrinsic disorder. We also addressed computational approaches for protein-protein interactions (PPIs), central to cellular function and interface-targeted drug design, alongside protein-ligand interactions, including novel generative methods. Two representative case studies targeting orphan G-protein-coupled receptors and intrinsically disordered regions demonstrate the transformative potential of these techniques for previously intractable systems. Despite these advances, significant challenges remain, including the need for experimental validation, effective modelling of protein flexibility, and ethical considerations surrounding AI-generated data. We also compare classical and AI-based structural biology pipelines, summarize key tools (e.g. transformers, graph neural networks, and diffusion models), and offer best practice guidelines for computational modelling and data visualization. These developments provide unprecedented insights into the dark proteome regions of the protein universe, enabling the structural illumination of previously uncharacterized and understudied proteins where structure or function was unknown. This review aims to serve as a roadmap for researchers seeking to harness AI innovations to tackle some of the most challenging aspects of proteomics.

Indexed as

AlphaFold2AlphaFold3Artificial intelligenceDark proteomeIntrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs)Machine learningProtein-protein interactions. Computational biologyProtein structure predictionRoseTTAFold

Identifiers

PMID42310771
PMCPMC13523371

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.