ReviewJournal of eating disorders2026
Unpacking weight management interventions measuring eating disorder risk in adults: coding of components of interventions in a systematic review.
Review in Journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
56 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAdult weight management interventions are complex; better understanding of the intervention components that may impact eating disorder (ED) risk is required.
methodsWeight management randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for adults with overweight/obesity that measured ED risk were systematically searched in four databases and two trial registries. A project-specific codebook was used to code 84 delivery features and 89 intervention strategies of trials. Individual strategies were grouped into 20 clusters which were further grouped into five broad categories. Trial investigators verified coding and narrative synthesis using descriptive statistics of findings was reported.
resultsOf 14,880 identified, 58 eligible trials were coded, of which 26 trials with 64 intervention arms were verified and therefore included. Intervention arms included a mean (SD) of 24 (11) intervention strategies. Commonly used intervention strategy clusters were nutrition education (91%), dietary behavior change strategies (84%), physical activity education (81%), and dietary self-monitoring (80%). Few interventions used strategies in the category of psychological components (13-41%). The median (range) intervention duration was 27 (4-104) weeks, and contacts with participants typically included a staged approach of weekly to monthly contact.
conclusionAdult weight management interventions are multifactorial with varying delivery features and intervention strategies. Despite this, psychological (e.g. weight stigma) and sleep-health related strategies are either rarely used or are underreported. Breaking down intervention components using our framework can help identify which strategies influence outcomes, including eating disorder risk, and inform the design and reporting of future interventions. Some adults seeking weight management for obesity may have an eating disorder or disordered eating behaviors. Research shows most people who take part in behavioral weight management programs have an improvement in eating disorder symptoms, however a small number may experience worsening symptoms. In this study, we break down behavioral weight management programs that measure eating disorder risk to better understand the features they use. We found that these programs vary widely in the number and type of strategies they use, as well as in how they are delivered, such as the length of the program. Strategies that focus on psychological factors (for example, addressing weight stigma) and sleep health were rarely used or reported. These findings are useful in guiding the design and reporting of future behavioral weight management programs. They can also be used in future research to determine which specific program features improve or worsen outcomes such as eating disorder risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.