ArticleNursing open2026
Exploring Professional Autonomy Among Palestinian Nurses: A Comprehensive Scoping Review of Determinants, Barriers and Clinical Practice Implications.
Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of Nursing Service Quality Gaps and Improvement Strategies in VIP General Wards Based on Patient-Reported Outcomes.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo systematically map the determinants, expressions and implications of nurses' clinical autonomy in Palestinian healthcare settings. BACKGROUND/
introductionNurses' autonomy is crucial for quality care, job satisfaction and patient safety. In Palestine, the healthcare system operates under unique political instability and resource constraints, yet a comprehensive synthesis of nursing autonomy in this context is lacking.
methodsA scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, ProQuest, Al-Manhal and Arab World Research Source were searched for literature published between January 2019 and March 2025. A total of 3916 records were identified across all databases, of which 1203 duplicates were removed, leaving 2713 unique records for screening. After title/abstract screening, 178 records proceeded to full-text review, and nine studies meeting the inclusion criteria were synthesized thematically. RESULTS/
findingsPalestinian nurses conceptualize autonomy as independent clinical decision-making, patient advocacy and participation in organizational processes, often exercised within significant constraints. Key determinants include education level, clinical experience, leadership styles and resource availability. Major barriers were physician-dominated hierarchies and the impacts of political conflict. Enhanced autonomy was associated with improved job satisfaction and patient safety reporting. DISCUSSION: The findings align with international research on determinants like education and leadership but highlight the profound, context-specific influence of political conflict and resource scarcity in Palestine. These factors create a practice environment where autonomy is often reactive and improvisational. Although formal quality appraisal was not conducted, consistent with scoping review methodology, Oxford Levels of Evidence were assigned to each study to aid interpretation of evidence strength. Readers should note that most included studies are cross-sectional or qualitative, which limits causal inference.
conclusionNurses' autonomy in Palestine is multifaceted and contextually embedded. Strengthening it requires multilevel strategies that address individual, organizational and systemic barriers, particularly those arising from the unique sociopolitical context. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurse leaders should adopt transformational leadership styles and create formal structures for nursing input in decision-making to empower staff and foster professional growth. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING AND HEALTH POLICY: Policymakers must develop clear national standards for autonomous nursing practice and invest in sustainable resources and staffing. International partners should support professional development and advocate for the protection of healthcare workers in conflict zones. REPORTING
methodThis review adhered to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.