ReviewDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2026
The Role of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Managing Hyperglycaemia First Detected in Pregnancy: A Narrative Review.
Review in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Role of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Managing Hyperglycaemia First Detected in Pregnancy: A Narrative Review.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hyperglycaemia first diagnosed in pregnancy (HIP) is the most common medical condition affecting pregnancy, affecting up to 40% of pregnancies in some countries. The global incidence of HIP is increasing owing to rising rates of overweight and obesity, advanced maternal age, and early screening for HIP. Current guidelines recommend self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) via frequent capillary finger-prick testing, which can be painful and inconvenient, contributing to poor adherence, psychological distress, and suboptimal glycaemic control. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) offers an alternative approach, providing real-time, automated glucose readings without the need for repeated invasive testing. This review evaluates the current evidence on the clinical benefits of CGM in HIP, including its effects on glycaemic control, maternal and neonatal outcomes, and patients' quality of life. Although existing studies are limited by small sample sizes and methodological variability, findings suggest that CGM might improve adherence, patient satisfaction, glycaemic control, and neonatal birth weight compared with SMBG. However, the lack of large-scale randomised trials has hindered widespread adoption and reimbursement of CGM for HIP. There is a clear need for more patient-centred glucose monitoring strategies and further research to confirm the long-term benefits of CGM in HIP management and to identify the patient populations most likely to benefit from CGM use. Addressing these gaps is essential to optimising care and improving outcomes for the growing population affected by HIP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.