Evidence mapPaperPMID 42311025Full record

ArticleClinical and translational medicine2026

Long-term trends in metabolic profiles across Chinese birth cohorts: A real-world big data analysis.

Ying Xiong, Xincen Duan, Jing Zhu, Jiayi Huang, Baishen Pan, Wenqi Shao, Beili Wang, Wei Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ying XiongDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xincen DuanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jing ZhuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jiayi HuangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Geriatric Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Baishen PanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wenqi ShaoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Beili WangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5167-170X
Wei GuoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

Key Disciplines of Shanghai Municipality's Health System 2024ZDXK0067National Key Technologies R&D Program 2022YFC3602301National Key Technologies R&D Program 2022YFC3602302National Natural Science Foundation of China 82172348National Natural Science Foundation of China 82473063Shanghai Baoshan Medical Key Specialty BSZK-2023-A18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe global burden of metabolic diseases is increasingly severe, with a continuous rise in prevalence among younger populations. There is an urgent need to explore the long-term trends of metabolic risk factors across generations. This study aimed to investigate birth cohort effects on metabolic profiles among Chinese adults to provide a basis for precision prevention and control.

methodsThis retrospective longitudinal study analysed real-world clinical laboratory data (2010-2024) from Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital in China including five metabolic indicators-fasting glucose (FG), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). The study included 3 888 861 adults born between 1930 and 1999, with 9059 individuals forming a fixed cohort for annual testing. Birth cohorts were defined in 10-year intervals from the 1930s to the 1990s. Linear regression (overall population) and mixed-effects models (fixed cohort) were used to assess cohort trends, adjusting for age and sex.

resultsIn the overall population, compared with earlier birth cohorts, later cohorts had significantly higher levels of FG (1990s vs. 1930s: +.438 mmol/L; p < .001). Lipid changes were more complex: TC and LDL-C decreased in earlier cohorts (1930s‒1970s) but rebounded in the 1980s‒1990s (LDL-C [1990s vs. 1930s]: +.034 mmol/L; p < .001), while HDL-C and TG continued to decline (HDL-C [1990s vs. 1930s]: ‒.075 mmol/L; TG [1990s vs. 1930s]: ‒.218 mmol/L; p < .001). Additionally, a fixed cohort with repeated annual measurements was established to provide longitudinal validation, enhancing the robustness of findings against population variability.

conclusionsThe significant birth cohort effects on metabolic indicators suggest that younger generations, particularly those 1980s‒1990s cohorts, face greater metabolic risks than 1930s‒1970s cohorts. These findings support intensifying early screening of blood glucose and lipid profiles and encourage prompt dietary and lifestyle modifications to counter the rising metabolic trends in the 1980s-1990s cohorts. KEY POINTS: Younger generations (1980s-1990s) exhibit higher fasting glucose and rebounding total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, alongside declining high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides compared to 1930s-1970s cohorts. A large fixed cohort with longitudinal follow-up robustly confirms the accelerated metabolic risk accumulation in younger Chinese generations. Findings underscore the critical need for early screening and preventive strategies targeting the 1980s-1990s birth cohorts.

Indexed as

Birth CohortMetabolomeAdultAgedBig DataBlood GlucoseChinaCholesterolEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTriglyceridesBlood GlucoseCholesterolTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID42311025
PMCPMC13276275

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.