Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42311201›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026

Surgical management of uterine fibroids.

Jordann-Mishael Lewis, Harold Wu, Augusto Cam Rojas, Ferry Boekhorst, Filipa Osório, Elif Goknur Topcu, Tsukasa Baba, Claudia C Lopez, Karen Wang, Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jordann-Mishael LewisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Howard University Hospital, Washington, D.C., Maryland, USA.
Harold WuDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Augusto Cam RojasPeruvian University of Applied Sciences, Lima, Perú.
Ferry BoekhorstDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, The Netherlands.
Filipa OsórioDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital da luz, Lisbon, Portugal.
Elif Goknur TopcuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sisli Kolan International Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Tsukasa BabaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan.
Claudia C LopezDepartment of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Clinica del Prado, Medellin, Colombia.
Karen WangDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Ivo Meinhold-HeerleinDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Justus Leibig University and University Hospital, Giessen, Germany.
Megan WassonDepartment of Medical and Surgical Gynecology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0510-6792

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgery continues to be a mainstay of treatment for patients with symptomatic fibroids. Hysterectomy is an option for those desiring definitive treatment and myomectomy is preferred for those that have not yet completed childbearing or wish to retain their uterus. While open laparotomy remains a viable approach to both hysterectomy and myomectomy, minimally invasive techniques for the surgical management of symptomatic fibroids are preferred options for many due to improved patient outcomes. These include hysteroscopic myomectomy, laparoscopic and robotically assisted myomectomy, and vaginal, laparoscopic, and robotically assisted hysterectomy. Patients have a faster recovery and less postoperative pain compared to a laparotomic approach. More recently, uterine-sparing outpatient modalities such as ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation and high-intensity focused ultrasound have emerged as promising alternatives for selected patients. Benefits include clinically significant reduction in fibroid size and menstrual bleeding with small or no abdominal incisions and an expedited convalescence. This article reviews preoperative evaluation and imaging for fibroids, as well as the techniques, approach, indications, patient selection, procedural management, and surgical and fertility outcomes for each surgical and procedural management of uterine fibroids.

Indexed as

LeiomyomaUterine NeoplasmsFemaleHumansHysterectomyLaparoscopyPatient SelectionRobotic Surgical ProceduresTreatment OutcomeUterine Myomectomyfibroidhysterectomyleiomyomamyomamyomectomysurgeryuterus

Identifiers

PMID42311201
PMCPMC13377383

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.