ArticleSensing and Bio-Sensing Research2025
Development of a novel protocol for processing fluorescent microspheres used in quantifying tissue perfusion.
Article in Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alteration of blood perfusion leads to some of the most common cardiovascular pathologies. Current methods for measuring perfusion use fluorescent polystyrene microspheres (MS) that are systemically injected prior to processing to obtain the absolute number of MS trapped inside the tissue. The current standard method is cost-intensive and carries a high risk of MS loss, leading to underestimation of regional perfusion. This study aimed to develop an improved, cost-efficient protocol for measuring regional perfusion through the processing and direct imaging of fluorescent MS embedded ex vivo. Porcine and control samples treated with MS were chemically digested, filtered through either a polycarbonate (PCTE) or cellulose filter, and fluorescence was measured either through the standard fluorometric method or through the proposed direct imaging method. In the standard fluorometric method, interactions were found between the PCTE filter and porcine samples, leading to dampened signal and the subsequent underestimation of regional perfusion in practice. The proposed direct imaging method with cellulose filters showed improved sensitivity even within low MS levels (limit of detection improved significantly), amplification of sample fluorescence (11-13× when compared to PCTE filters), parity between porcine and control samples, and a reduction in cost providing a significant improvement over the industry standard for fluorescent MS perfusion measurement (28-51 % reduction compared to standard method). The proposed method also removed the need for 2-ethoxy ethyl acetate, a teratogen and plastic softener, and reduced complexity in the workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.