SynthesisFrontiers in microbiology2026
Gut microbiota alterations associated with anxiety and depression in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review of prospective cohorts and randomized trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anxiety and depression are highly prevalent among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and are closely associated with reduced quality of life and poor treatment adherence. The gut-brain axis has been proposed as a key mechanistic framework, with the gut microbiota playing a central role. However, findings from clinical studies remain inconsistent, and a comprehensive synthesis of the evidence is lacking. Objective: This systematic review aimed to integrate evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies to evaluate the associations between gut microbiota characteristics, microbiota-targeted interventions, and symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients with IBD. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, and Scopus. The search covered records from database inception to October 17, 2025. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A descriptive synthesis approach was used to summarize the findings. Study quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. Results: Ten studies were included, comprising six prospective cohort studies and four RCTs. These studies included a total of 1,040 patients with IBD. Cohort studies consistently showed that anxiety and depressive symptoms were associated with reduced microbial α-diversity, enrichment of pro-inflammatory taxa, and depletion of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA)-producing bacteria. These associations persisted after adjustment for inflammatory markers. They were also observed when analyses were restricted to patients in remission. This suggests that the associations may not be fully explained by disease activity. Evidence from RCTs showed that microbiota-targeted interventions, including probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation, modulated microbial composition and reduced anxiety and depression scores. Studies combining psychological interventions with microbiota profiling also suggested potential effects on gut microbial composition. However, the findings remain heterogeneous. Conclusion: Current evidence supports a close and potentially bidirectional association between gut microbiota dysbiosis and anxiety and depression in patients with IBD. Both microbiota-targeted interventions and psychological therapies may represent promising strategies for managing psychological comorbidities in IBD. Future large-scale, standardized longitudinal studies and randomized controlled trials are warranted to clarify directionality, test causal hypotheses, and develop personalized intervention approaches. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD420251166542.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.