Evidence mapPaperPMID 42311388Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in microbiology2026

Gut microbiota alterations associated with anxiety and depression in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review of prospective cohorts and randomized trials.

Tao Zhang, Lin Wang, Zhetan Ren, Ru Man, Xiaozhen Cheng, Ling Wang, Jing Wang, Xiumei Bu, Yongduo Yu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tao Zhang *Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China.
Lin Wang *Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China.
Zhetan Ren *Department of General Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ru ManLiaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China.
Xiaozhen ChengShenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Ling WangLiaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China.
Jing WangSecond Affiliated Hospital, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China.
Xiumei BuLiaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China.
Yongduo YuSecond Affiliated Hospital, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anxiety and depression are highly prevalent among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and are closely associated with reduced quality of life and poor treatment adherence. The gut-brain axis has been proposed as a key mechanistic framework, with the gut microbiota playing a central role. However, findings from clinical studies remain inconsistent, and a comprehensive synthesis of the evidence is lacking. Objective: This systematic review aimed to integrate evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies to evaluate the associations between gut microbiota characteristics, microbiota-targeted interventions, and symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients with IBD. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, and Scopus. The search covered records from database inception to October 17, 2025. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A descriptive synthesis approach was used to summarize the findings. Study quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. Results: Ten studies were included, comprising six prospective cohort studies and four RCTs. These studies included a total of 1,040 patients with IBD. Cohort studies consistently showed that anxiety and depressive symptoms were associated with reduced microbial α-diversity, enrichment of pro-inflammatory taxa, and depletion of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA)-producing bacteria. These associations persisted after adjustment for inflammatory markers. They were also observed when analyses were restricted to patients in remission. This suggests that the associations may not be fully explained by disease activity. Evidence from RCTs showed that microbiota-targeted interventions, including probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation, modulated microbial composition and reduced anxiety and depression scores. Studies combining psychological interventions with microbiota profiling also suggested potential effects on gut microbial composition. However, the findings remain heterogeneous. Conclusion: Current evidence supports a close and potentially bidirectional association between gut microbiota dysbiosis and anxiety and depression in patients with IBD. Both microbiota-targeted interventions and psychological therapies may represent promising strategies for managing psychological comorbidities in IBD. Future large-scale, standardized longitudinal studies and randomized controlled trials are warranted to clarify directionality, test causal hypotheses, and develop personalized intervention approaches. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD420251166542.

Indexed as

anxietygut–brain axisgut microbiotainflammatory bowel diseasesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42311388
PMCPMC13269098

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.