SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Ocular disorders during treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Different observational studies have analyzed the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) on the risk of ocular adverse events (AEs). The present meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of GLP-1 RAs on the risk of ocular AEs, including retinopathy, glaucoma, and non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION). Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from 2006 to 2025. Studies involving individuals diagnosed with diabetes and/or obesity and overweight, receiving GLP-1 RAs, and evaluating outcomes related to ocular AEs were included. A random-effect meta-analysis approach was used. This study followed the PRISMA statement. Results: A total of 28 observational studies (6 for semaglutide and 22 for all GLP-1 RAs) involving T2DM patients were included. When compared to other antidiabetic treatments, GLP-1 RAs did not increase the risk of developing ocular disorders such as NAION (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.62-1.64; I Conclusion: Even if no difference was observed between GLP-1 RAs and other antidiabetic medications for all safety outcomes evaluated, it is optimal to monitor the administration of these molecules. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251080120, identifier CRD420251080120.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.