ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
The cGAS-STING pathway in cancer immunotherapy: prognostic value and therapeutic potential.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immune response to DNA and RNA: structural insights, molecular mechanisms, and therapeutic targeting.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite major advances in T cell-directed cancer immunotherapy, many patients fail to achieve durable responses, underscoring the need for approaches that mobilize additional arms of the immune system. The cyclic GMP-AMP synthase-stimulator of interferon genes (cGAS-STING) pathway has emerged as a central cytosolic DNA sensor that initiates robust type I interferon signaling and bridges innate and adaptive antitumor immunity. Clinically, heightened cGAS-STING activity correlates with improved survival and enhanced responsiveness to immune checkpoint blockade in subset of tumor types. Preclinical studies have further demonstrated that the pharmacologic or genetic activation of cGAS-STING suppresses tumor growth, promotes dendritic cell maturation, increases effector immune infiltration, and synergizes with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition. However, the spectrum of tumors that derive the greatest therapeutic benefit from STING activation and the mechanisms underlying pathway silencing or non-responsiveness remain incompletely defined. In this review, we integrate mechanistic, preclinical, and clinical evidence across solid tumors and hematologic malignancies to delineate the roles of cGAS-STING as both a prognostic biomarker and a therapeutic target. Our synthesis highlights the context-dependent nature of cGAS-STING signaling, with therapeutic outcomes shaped by STING pathway integrity, tumor mutational burden, cytosolic DNA load, and the immunologic composition of the tumor microenvironment. Importantly, we examine emerging evidence that excessive, systemic, or chronic STING activation can drive immune exhaustion, tolerogenic myeloid reprogramming, and treatment-limiting toxicity, which are factors likely to contribute to efficacy limitations of the first-generation STING agonists. We further discuss how rational combination strategies, optimized delivery platforms, and the kinetic control of STING activation may overcome these barriers. Collectively, this synthesis provides a conceptual framework to guide the development of next-generation immunotherapies that leverage cGAS-STING signaling while avoiding the immunosuppressive consequences of dysregulated innate immune activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.