ArticleFrontiers in dementia2026
National and international models of involving people with lived experience in dementia policy, advocacy and research.
Article in Frontiers in dementia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Globally, there is growing recognition of the need to advance approaches to involve people with lived experience of dementia as collaborators in policy, advocacy and research activities. Involvement is viewed as a right by dementia advocates and others, and some organizations have developed mechanisms to support this collaboration, such as through dedicated resources for infrastructure or as a condition of research funding. However, there is limited literature on how national and international organizations support the involvement of people with lived experience of dementia. In this perspective article, we describe different approaches to involving people with lived experience in policy, advocacy and research activities across national and international network contexts. We outline and compare the approaches taken by the Engagement of People with Lived Experience of Dementia program and advisory group (Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging), Alzheimer Society Research Network (Alzheimer's Society UK), European Working Group of People With Dementia and European Dementia Carers Working Group (Alzheimer Europe), and the Lived Experience Advisory Group (Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin). For each example presented, we describe the initiative (e.g., purpose, brief history, structure). We discuss the four initiatives in order to identify common and context-specific barriers and enablers to involvement. We hope that the findings will help others to develop their own initiatives to involve people with lived experience of dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.