SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2026
Vitamin D levels, general health status, and work productivity among healthcare workers-a scoping review of published literature (2010-2025).
Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, well being, and presenteeism among hospital porters: a single-center cross-sectional study in Greece.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The risk for Vitamin D deficiency has been reported to be elevated among healthcare workers (HCWs), a fact that raises concerns about their health, resilience, and work performance. The objective of the study is to review published literature on Vitamin D deficiency among HCWs, reported health implications as well as the association with productivity. Methods: A comprehensive search of two databases (2010-2025), PubMed and Scopus was conducted with Google Scholar used as a supplementary source following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The inclusion criteria were full-text studies in English enrolling HCWs per WHO definition, measuring serum 25(OH)D, and reporting health or work-related outcomes. Results: Thirty-six studies met the criteria 30 cross-sectional, 2 prospective, 4 interventional studies, 2 of which were Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). Vitamin D deficiency was highly prevalent across studies with reported prevalence ranging from 30% to over 90% varying by geographic region, season, professional role, deficiency threshold and assay method, particularly among nurses and shift workers. Key determinants included indoor work, long shifts, night duties, limited sun exposure, female sex, younger age, higher Body Mass Index (BMI), veiling, and lack of supplementation. Seasonal variation was confirmed. Deficiency was linked to immune vulnerability (higher SARS-CoV-2 infection), musculoskeletal issues, and mixed evidence for mental health outcomes. Limited data suggest higher Vitamin D levels may reduce presenteeism. RCTs demonstrated that high-dose supplementation improved serum levels and reduced respiratory infections. Conclusion: Existing literature points that Vitamin D inadequacy among HCWs represents significant occupational health concern highlighting important evidence gaps and future research priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.