ReviewACS pharmacology & translational science2026
Cyclin-Dependent Kinases 4 and 6 Inhibitors: An Emerging Therapeutic Framework from Growth Suppression to Tumor Clearance.
Review in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel 1H-Indole-3-carboxamide Derivatives as CDK4 Inhibitors for Treating Cancer.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2026Article
- Novel Compounds as CDK4 Inhibitors for Treating Breast Cancer.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review explores strategies to overcome the clinical limitations of Cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, namely, reversible cytostasis and acquired resistance. We outline an emerging therapeutic framework in which these inhibitors induce specific vulnerabilities, shifting the treatment objective from growth suppression toward tumor clearance. Specifically, we analyze the effects of CDK4/6 inhibitors across four interconnected domains: cellular senescence, compromised DNA damage repair, metabolic reprogramming, and immune microenvironment remodeling. Building upon this framework, we summarize rational combination strategiessuch as pairing with senolytics, poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)designed to exploit these induced vulnerabilities. To bridge preclinical rationale with clinical application, we discuss key translational determinants, noting that successful implementation depends on biomarker-guided patient selection and optimized dosing schedules (e.g., sequential administration) to mitigate overlapping toxicities. Collectively, the evidence suggests that rational combination strategies could repurpose CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy for more durable tumor control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.