ArticlePsychological medicine2026
The developmental shift in aperiodic activity and its link to the default mode network in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Article in Psychological medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAttention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) involves altered neurodevelopment, yet the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Aperiodic EEG components may reflect neural functions like excitatory/inhibitory balance, but their age-related differences in ADHD and link to default mode network (DMN) dysfunction are unexplored.
methodsWe included 110 medication-naïve children/adolescents with ADHD and 100 matched typically developing peers aged 6-14 years. Aperiodic parameters (exponent, offset) were derived, and source-localized alpha-band DMN coherence was computed. The sample was stratified into middle childhood (6-9 years) and early adolescence (10-14 years) subgroups to delineate age-dependent patterns.
resultsADHD showed globally increased exponent and offset versus controls. Normative age-related decreases were significantly attenuated in ADHD, indicating divergence from typical development. Age-stratified analyses revealed distinct patterns: in middle childhood, increased frontal offset correlated positively with inattention (right hemisphere) and hyperactivity/impulsivity (left hemisphere); in early adolescence, it associated with reduced coherence in two DMN pathways (right mSFG-left hippocampus and left mSFG-right MTG).
conclusionsAperiodic activity differences in ADHD are age-dependent. Younger children exhibit focal, symptom-linked frontal abnormalities, whereas adolescents show pervasive network-level dysregulation. Aperiodic measures may capture age-varying ADHD pathophysiology, informing developmentally targeted biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.