ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026
Does Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)-Based CYP2D6 Sequencing Improve Genotype-Phenotype Concordance in Tamoxifen-Treated Patients?
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Pharmacology at the Point of Decision.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CYP2D6 metabolizes about 20% of commonly used drugs, including tamoxifen, a major hormone therapy for breast cancer. Although the relationship between tamoxifen pharmacokinetics and CYP2D6 genotype has been demonstrated, residual variability in drug exposure remains unexplained. Given the high genetic polymorphism of CYP2D6, including copy number variations and hybrid genes, targeted genotyping may fail to capture rare or complex alleles. To explore this limitation, 68 individuals from a cohort of tamoxifen-treated patients were selected based on discordance between CYP2D6 genotype determined by a targeted approach and phenotype assessed from pharmacokinetic data, and were analyzed using full-gene next-generation sequencing with in-house panel and bioinformatics pipeline. Full CYP2D6 gene sequencing refined genotypes in 41% of patients, and changed metabolizer status in 19%, mainly by detecting common alleles missed by the initial targeted assay. After removing these sources of discrepancy, sequencing improved diplotype assignment in 23.5% and metabolizer status classification in 7.4% of patients, largely driven by the detection of structural variants, with an additional contribution from the rare nonfunctional CYP2D6*62 allele, identified in one patient. In addition, several rare variants or variants of uncertain significance (including CYP2D6*22, *23, *28, p.Ala165Gly. and p.Pro264Thr) were identified and further evaluated using adapted in silico prediction strategies, compared with patients' phenotypes and published in vitro data. Comprehensive CYP2D6 sequencing improved gene profiling accuracy in our preselected cohort, while highlighting the remaining challenges of rare variant interpretation in pharmacogenetics-guided therapeutic drug monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.