ReviewPathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Therapy of melanoma : Current standards and future perspectives].
Review in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMelanoma is an aggressive skin cancer with a rising incidence. While early-stage disease can often be managed successfully with surgical intervention alone, advanced stages require immunotherapies and, where appropriate, targeted treatments, which have significantly improved prognosis and overall survival.
objectivesThis review summarizes current therapeutic standards and emerging developments in melanoma treatment and evaluates their clinical relevance. MATERIALS AND
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted up to 2025, including guidelines, clinical trials, and review articles on surgical, immunological, and targeted therapies.
resultsSurgical resection remains the standard of care in early-stage melanoma. In advanced stages, immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD‑1, CTLA‑4, LAG-3) reduce recurrence risk in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings and improve overall survival in metastatic disease. Local and intralesional therapies (e.g., T‑VEC, Daromun) complement systemic approaches. In BRAF-V600-mutant melanoma, combinations of BRAF and MEK inhibitors are effective and are particularly used in cases of rapidly progressing disease. Novel approaches such as bispecific antibodies, cell-based therapies, and various tumor-specific vaccines show promising results in early clinical studies.
conclusionsMultimodal treatment strategies have fundamentally improved the prognosis of melanoma. Therapy selection should be individualized based on molecular markers and disease stage. Future developments aim to integrate combination strategies, personalized immunotherapeutic approaches, and the overcoming of resistance mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42313150What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.