ReviewClinical and experimental medicine2026
Engineered small extracellular vesicles in hematologic malignancies: mechanisms, therapeutic strategies, and translational challenges.
Review in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hematologic malignancies remain among the most challenging cancers to treat due to genetic heterogeneity, clonal evolution, and therapy resistance. Extracellular vesicles (EVs), particularly small EV (sEV)-enriched populations, have emerged as active mediators of disease biology, contributing to tumor progression, immune evasion, and chemoresistance through intercellular transfer of bioactive cargo. Recent advances in EV engineering have repositioned these vesicles as programmable delivery platforms capable of transporting nucleic acids, proteins, and chemotherapeutic agents with improved targeting potential. Preclinical studies across multiple hematologic models demonstrate that engineered EVs can induce immune activation, modulate oncogenic signaling pathways, and partially overcome drug resistance. However, these findings remain largely confined to experimental settings, with limited standardization of loading efficiency, biodistribution, and functional potency. Clinically, EV-based applications in hematology are still at an early stage, with most studies focused on biomarker discovery and supportive therapies rather than direct antitumor interventions. In parallel, theranostic EV platforms and liquid biopsy approaches offer promising opportunities for minimally invasive disease monitoring, although their clinical validation remains incomplete. Artificial intelligence (AI) further enhances this field by enabling advanced biomarker analysis and guiding cargo design and targeting strategies, yet its therapeutic applications are still largely exploratory. Despite key challenges, including vesicle heterogeneity, donor variability, suboptimal cargo loading, and manufacturing constraints, these limitations are primarily technical and may be addressed through standardization and engineering optimization. Collectively, EV-based systems represent a promising but still maturing platform with the potential to contribute to next-generation precision oncology in hematologic malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.