ArticleGeroScience2026
CRT upgrade improves frailty status in patients with HFrEF and RV pacing-a post hoc analysis of the BUDAPEST-CRT trial.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Frailty and heart failure (HF) both have become increasingly prevalent and each adversely affects prognosis. Data regarding the potential frailty-modifying effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) upgrade remain scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of frailty on clinical outcomes in the Budapest-CRT Upgrade trial population. Patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), an implanted pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and ≥ 20% right ventricular pacing burden were randomized to CRT-D upgrade (n = 215) or ICD alone (n = 145). Our primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, HF-hospitalization and or < 15% reduction of left ventricular end-systolic volume at 12 months. Frailty was assessed using a 31-item frailty index (FI) based on the Rockwood method, and patients were dichotomized according to the median FI. Among 360 patients, the mean baseline FI was 0.39 ± 0.10, with follow-up FI available in 282 patients at 12 months. CRT-D upgrade significantly decreased the risk of the primary endpoint regardless of baseline FI compared to ICD alone (interaction p = 0.17). CRT-D upgrade led to a 0.03-point greater reduction in the mean FI change compared to the ICD arm (mean FI difference at 12-month - 0.03; 95% CI - 0.04 to - 0.01; p = 0.005). In this highly comorbid cohort, frailty was common but it did not diminish the clinical benefit of CRT-D upgrade. CRT-D upgrade decreased the risk of the primary endpoint regardless of baseline frailty status and led to a significant decrease in mean FI change compared to ICD alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42313253What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.