Evidence mapPaperPMID 42313253Full record

ArticleGeroScience2026

CRT upgrade improves frailty status in patients with HFrEF and RV pacing-a post hoc analysis of the BUDAPEST-CRT trial.

Luca Kuthi, Eperke Merkel, Marianna Németh, Boglárka Veres, Zoltán Szakács, Anett Behon, Richárd Masszi, Zsuzsanna Kis, Roland Papp, Levente Molnár and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Luca KuthiHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor 68, 1122, Budapest, Hungary.
Eperke MerkelHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor 68, 1122, Budapest, Hungary.
Marianna NémethHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor 68, 1122, Budapest, Hungary.
Boglárka VeresHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor 68, 1122, Budapest, Hungary.
Zoltán SzakácsHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor 68, 1122, Budapest, Hungary.
Anett BehonHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor 68, 1122, Budapest, Hungary.
Richárd MassziHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor 68, 1122, Budapest, Hungary.
Zsuzsanna KisHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor 68, 1122, Budapest, Hungary.
Roland PappHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor 68, 1122, Budapest, Hungary.
Levente MolnárHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor 68, 1122, Budapest, Hungary.
Attila KovácsHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor 68, 1122, Budapest, Hungary.
Annamária KosztinHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor 68, 1122, Budapest, Hungary.
Béla MerkelyHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor 68, 1122, Budapest, Hungary. merkely.bela@kardio.sote.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6514-0723
Walter Richard SchwertnerHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor 68, 1122, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

European Union RRF-2.3.1-21-2022-00003Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal FK_23 OTKA (FK147312)Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal TKP2021-EGA-23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frailty and heart failure (HF) both have become increasingly prevalent and each adversely affects prognosis. Data regarding the potential frailty-modifying effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) upgrade remain scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of frailty on clinical outcomes in the Budapest-CRT Upgrade trial population. Patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), an implanted pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and ≥ 20% right ventricular pacing burden were randomized to CRT-D upgrade (n = 215) or ICD alone (n = 145). Our primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, HF-hospitalization and or < 15% reduction of left ventricular end-systolic volume at 12 months. Frailty was assessed using a 31-item frailty index (FI) based on the Rockwood method, and patients were dichotomized according to the median FI. Among 360 patients, the mean baseline FI was 0.39 ± 0.10, with follow-up FI available in 282 patients at 12 months. CRT-D upgrade significantly decreased the risk of the primary endpoint regardless of baseline FI compared to ICD alone (interaction p = 0.17). CRT-D upgrade led to a 0.03-point greater reduction in the mean FI change compared to the ICD arm (mean FI difference at 12-month - 0.03; 95% CI - 0.04 to - 0.01; p = 0.005). In this highly comorbid cohort, frailty was common but it did not diminish the clinical benefit of CRT-D upgrade. CRT-D upgrade decreased the risk of the primary endpoint regardless of baseline frailty status and led to a significant decrease in mean FI change compared to ICD alone.

Indexed as

CRT-D upgradeFrailtyHeart failure

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.