ReviewReviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders2026
An elusive link between blood measures of advanced glycation end products and their receptors and cognitive impairment syndromes in people with diabetes: A scoping review.
Review in Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advanced glycation end products (AGEs), which are glycated forms of proteins and lipids, are increased in diabetes resulting from chronic hyperglycemia. AGEs and their receptor (RAGE) have been linked to cognitive impairment syndromes and may increase the risk of cognitive decline and impairment in people with diabetes who experience chronic hyperglycemia. The objective of this scoping review was to comprehensively document the current evidence concerning the relationship between AGEs and RAGE, measured in the blood, and cognitive function and cognitive impairment syndromes in people with diabetes. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection, APA PsycInfo, and the Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection were queried, and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines were followed for reporting of methods and results. Twenty-two articles were included in the current scoping review. Among the included articles, we found largely mixed results, whereby both higher and lower levels of AGEs/RAGE were associated with worse cognition or presence of cognitive impairment syndromes in people with diabetes; however, due to notable differences in the methodologies employed to quantify AGEs/RAGE in blood, it is challenging to interpret the factors driving the observed variability. Methodological differences that are likely relevant to AGEs/RAGE quantification include use of plasma vs. serum and selection of AGEs/RAGE studied (e.g., total AGEs/RAGE, pentosidine, carboxymethyl lysine, etc.). Given the observed inconsistencies, currently, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that blood-based AGEs and/or RAGE are indicators of risk for cognitive impairment and decline in people with diabetes. Moreover, it remains undetermined as to which AGEs species or RAGE isoform is most predictive of cognitive impairment or decline in people with diabetes. More studies are needed that include larger sample sizes and well-described and validated methodology to measure AGEs/RAGE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42313319What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.