ReviewCell stress & chaperones2026
Evolution of Hsp90 targeting: From stress biology to clinical translation.
Review in Cell stress & chaperones, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hsp90 inhibitors represent a decades-long experimental framework that has progressively uncovered how molecular chaperone systems are organized, regulated, and rewired in disease. Early natural products established that pharmacologic engagement of Hsp90 simultaneously destabilizes broad client networks and exposes a central layer of proteostasis control. Subsequent structural, biochemical, and translational studies revealed the mechanistic importance of nucleotide-driven conformational cycling, cochaperone exchange, paralog specialization, and subcellular compartmentalization, as well as the emergence of disease-specific chaperone assemblies such as the epichaperome. In parallel, adaptive responses to Hsp90 inhibition, including heat-shock factor 1 activation, unfolded-protein-response signaling, autophagy induction, and oncogenic network rewiring, illuminated the resilience built into proteostasis architecture and the conditions under which it can be overcome. Later inhibitor classes, encompassing C-terminal allosteric ligands, middle-domain modulators, isoform-selective agents, epichaperome-directed compounds, and targeted degraders, extended the field from pan-inhibition toward increasingly precise intervention in specific chaperone states. The first regulatory approval of an Hsp90 inhibitor, Pimitespib, for refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumor, marks a translational milestone that validates this framework clinically. Combination studies have further mapped where Hsp90 inhibition is most informative and most effective, demonstrating that benefit is strongest when deployment is guided by defined client dependency, proteostasis burden, immune context, or biomarker selection. Together, these advances position Hsp90 inhibitor research as a major source of mechanistic insight into molecular chaperones and as a foundation for biomarker-guided, context-aware targeting of proteostasis in oncology and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.