Trial reportEBioMedicine2026
CNS target engagement of high-dose DHA supplementation in older adults at risk for dementia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Trial report in EBioMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03613844 (The Delivery of Essential Fatty Acids to the Brain), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Delivery of Essential Fatty Acids to the Brain
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAPOE ε4 carriers have increased Alzheimer's disease risk and altered omega-3 metabolism. No large-scale prevention trials have tested high-dose docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation specifically in non-demented APOE ε4 carriers with low baseline omega-3 intake for early intervention.
methodsWe conducted a phase IIa 24-month, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT03613844) at the University of Southern California between September 2018 and May 2024. Participants aged 55-80 years without dementia, low dietary DHA intake (<200 mg/day), and ≥1 dementia risk factor were stratified by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection willingness into lumbar puncture (LP) or no-LP arms. Within each arm, participants were randomised 1:1 to receive 2 g/day DHA or placebo, stratified by APOE ε4 status. Primary outcome was the 6-month CSF DHA-to-arachidonic acid (AA) ratio change. Secondary and exploratory outcomes included 24-month neuroimaging and cognitive measures.
findingsOf 739 screened individuals, 365 participants were randomised (181 LP arm, 184 no-LP arm). Mean age was 66.4 years (SD 5.7), 210 (58%) were female, 142 (39%) were Hispanic, 173 (47%) were APOE ε4 carriers. DHA supplementation increased CSF DHA/AA ratio at 6 months vs placebo (0.17 [95% CI 0.15-0.18] vs -0.02 [95% CI -0.04 to -0.0004]; difference 0.19 [95% CI 0.16-0.21]; p < 0.0001), independent of APOE ε4 status (interaction p = 0.71). Dropout was 38%, mainly due to COVID-19. No treatment differences were observed in brain volumes or cognitive performance over 24 months. Adverse events were comparable between groups, with no serious adverse events attributed to treatment.
interpretationHigh-dose DHA achieved CNS target engagement in non-demented older adults with low baseline omega-3 intake, independent of APOE ε4. Despite biochemical target engagement, no differences in cognition or brain structure were observed over 24 months. Future research should prioritise brain DHA metabolism over further supplementation trials.
fundingNational Institute on Aging (R01AG057684) and the ADDF (GC-201711-2014197).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.