ArticleScientific reports2026
Sliding mode control gain optimization for a robot arm manipulator using an improved stochastic framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present an optimization-control framework for trajectory tracking of a 3-DoF manipulator, where an improved Stochastic Paint Optimizer (SPO-CL1) automatically tunes the gains of a sliding mode controller. Designed to address robotic challenges such as nonlinearities, couplings, and disturbances, the approach aims to achieve high tracking accuracy, rapid convergence, reduced chattering, and limited actuation effort, while remaining simple and robust to parameter variations. SPO-CL1 integrates three structure-aware enhancements into the original SPO architecture: chaotic initialization via the Chebyshev map to diversify the initial population, Opposition-Based Learning applied after the clustering phase to accelerate convergence, and periodic Lévy flight perturbations targeting the best solution to escape local optima. The SMC gains are automatically tuned by minimizing the Integrated Squared Error cost function J = ∫₀ᵀ eᵀ(t)e(t)dt. Two phases of validation were conducted. First, SPO-CL1 is benchmarked against eleven algorithms including recent hybrid variants (IGWO, EWOA, MHHO, HSMA) on the CEC-2022 suite, achieving the best Friedman rank of 1.83 and statistically significant superiority confirmed by Wilcoxon rank-sum tests (α = 0.05). Second, a path planning experiment on a Lemniscate of Bernoulli trajectory demonstrates that SPO-CL1 achieves the lowest ISE of 1.51 × 10⁻⁴ with near-zero inter-run variance, the fastest tracking error convergence, and the tightest end-effector trajectory among all twelve compared algorithms. These results confirm that SPO-CL1 is a competitive and reliable approach for automatic SMC gain tuning in complex robotic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.