ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2026
Non-tobacco nicotine dependence is associated with increased complications following clavicle open reduction internal fixation.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTobacco dependence is well established to impair bone healing and increase postoperative complications. However, the independent effects of nicotine, separate from combustion-related factors, remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of non-tobacco nicotine dependence (NTND) following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of clavicle fractures, including midshaft and lateral fracture subtypes.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was performed using a large national database. Patients undergoing ORIF of clavicle fractures were identified using procedural and diagnostic codes. Patients with non-tobacco nicotine dependence (e.g., vaping, patches, or gum) were identified and propensity score matched to (1) patients without nicotine exposure and (2) patients with tobacco nicotine dependence. In a secondary analysis, patients were stratified by fracture type (midshaft and lateral), and outcomes were compared between nicotine exposure and no nicotine exposure within each subgroup. Outcomes were assessed at 90 days and 1 year and included medical complications, number of opioid prescriptions, and implant-related outcomes. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, with p < 0.05 considered significant.
resultsAfter matching, 936 non-tobacco nicotine users were identified. Non-tobacco nicotine dependence was associated with increased implant removal at 90 days (RR 2.50) and higher opioid prescriptions (p < 0.05). At 1-year, non-tobacco nicotine use was associated with increased implant removal (RR 1.74), infection (RR 1.73), and nonunion (RR 1.78) (p < 0.05). In direct comparisons between non-tobacco nicotine and tobacco nicotine users (n = 897), there were no significant differences in postoperative complications or implant-related outcomes (all p > 0.05). In fracture-specific analyses, nicotine use was associated with increased infection (RR 2.17), nonunion (RR 1.42), and implant removal (RR 1.24) in midshaft fractures (p < 0.05), with no significant differences observed in lateral fractures.
conclusionNon-tobacco nicotine dependence was associated with increased risks of infection, opioid utilization, implant removal, and nonunion following clavicle fracture fixation. These associations were observed predominantly in midshaft fractures, with no significant differences in lateral fractures. These findings suggest that non-tobacco nicotine dependence may carry a risk profile similar to that of tobacco use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.