ReviewCardiology and therapy2026
A Patient and Physician Perspective of Chronic Coronary Syndrome and Persistent Stable Angina in Brazil.
Review in Cardiology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obstructions in the coronary arteries, arterial vasospasm, and microcirculation dysfunction may cause chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). Angina is a cardinal symptom of CCS and the journey of patients with angina is often filled with challenges and uncertainties. Diagnosis and treatment differences seem to vary between men and women with angina. This article is co-authored by a male and a female patient diagnosed with persistent stable angina and their treating cardiologist at the Heart Institute in São Paulo, Brazil. The patients share their personal experiences of more than 20 years of coping with pain and the related impact on their physical capacity, thus illustrating the challenging journey often faced by individuals with angina and how it differs between men and women. They describe the long pathway from the onset of symptoms to the correct diagnosis and list the various interventional procedures they underwent, focusing on the impact of angina on their daily lives. They also mention their participation in a clinical study. The cardiologist discusses the critical elements in the diagnostic process of angina, and reflects on how the misconception that heart disease primarily affects men can lead to delayed diagnosis and treatment for women suffering from this condition. Moreover, he emphasizes that many patients experience angina due to myocardial ischemia without obstructive coronary artery disease, highlighting the need to raise disease awareness among healthcare professionals, as well as in society. Finally, the physician underscores the importance of better patient assessment and medical treatment optimization to managing angina and meeting patients' needs and expectations, while prioritizing patient quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.