ReviewClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2026
MiR-31 as a predictive biomarker of cetuximab efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: systematic review.
Review in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCetuximab is an EGFR inhibitor used in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). It demonstrates significant response variability even among RAS wild-type patients, with only ~65% objective response rates as first-line therapy. Current biomarkers, including RAS and BRAF mutation status, are insufficient to fully predict cetuximab efficacy. MicroRNA-31 (miR-31-3p and miR-31-5p) has emerged as a potential predictive biomarker through its role in activating the RAS signaling pathway by suppressing RAS p21 GTPase activating protein 1 (RASA1). This systematic review evaluates the evidence on miR-31 as a predictive biomarker for cetuximab response in mCRC.
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar through May 2026. Original studies evaluating miR-31 expression in relation to cetuximab response in mCRC were included. Data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool for clinical trials. The study followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
resultsEleven studies (3 clinical trials, 8 observational/retrospective studies; sample sizes 26-370) were included, with moderate to high quality scores. Low miR-31-3p expression was consistently associated with improved cetuximab outcomes. In the FIRE-3 trial, low miR-31-3p expressers demonstrated superior overall survival (HR: 0.61; P = 0.01), progression-free survival (HR: 0.74; P = 0.05), and overall response rate (OR: 4.0; P = 0.01) with cetuximab versus bevacizumab. The PROSPECT-C trial showed better response rates (58.3% vs. 22.2%; P = 0.029) and longer progression-free survival with low expression. Conversely, elevated miR-31 expression was associated with shorter progression-free survival. Notably, miR-31-3p did not predict anti-EGFR efficacy in right-sided tumors.
conclusionMiR-31-3p is a promising predictive biomarker for cetuximab response in RAS wild-type mCRC, with low expression consistently associated with improved outcomes. However, tumor sidedness may modulate its predictive value. Prospective validation studies with standardized assays are needed before clinical implementation. Integration of miR-31-3p with existing markers could help identify patients unlikely to benefit from anti-EGFR therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42315817What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.