Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42315817›Full record

ReviewClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2026

MiR-31 as a predictive biomarker of cetuximab efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: systematic review.

Thanmai Reddy Thugu, Kesar Prajapati, Ahmad Alhomaid, Muskan Jain, Neha Singh, Sonali Dash, Neeharika John Madhavaram, Jamila Begam Jabar Ali, Sai Gautham Kanagala, Rupak Desai and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Thanmai Reddy ThuguInternal Medicine, East Liverpool City Hospital, East Liverpool, OH, USA.
Kesar PrajapatiInternal Medicine, New York Medical College/Metropolitan Hospital Center, New York, NY, USA. prajapak@nychhc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3726-4889
Ahmad AlhomaidInternal Medicine, Mercy Health, Jefferson, MO, USA.
Muskan JainDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Neha SinghInternal Medicine, North Alabama Medical Center, IM, Florence, AL, USA.
Sonali DashUndergrad at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Neeharika John MadhavaramInternal Medicine, BLDE University, Bijapur, Karnataka, India.
Jamila Begam Jabar AliTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA.
Sai Gautham KanagalaInternal Medicine, New York Medical College/Metropolitan Hospital Center, New York, NY, USA.
Rupak DesaiIndependent Outcomes Researcher, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Akhil JainDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCetuximab is an EGFR inhibitor used in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). It demonstrates significant response variability even among RAS wild-type patients, with only ~65% objective response rates as first-line therapy. Current biomarkers, including RAS and BRAF mutation status, are insufficient to fully predict cetuximab efficacy. MicroRNA-31 (miR-31-3p and miR-31-5p) has emerged as a potential predictive biomarker through its role in activating the RAS signaling pathway by suppressing RAS p21 GTPase activating protein 1 (RASA1). This systematic review evaluates the evidence on miR-31 as a predictive biomarker for cetuximab response in mCRC.

methodsA systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar through May 2026. Original studies evaluating miR-31 expression in relation to cetuximab response in mCRC were included. Data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool for clinical trials. The study followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines.

resultsEleven studies (3 clinical trials, 8 observational/retrospective studies; sample sizes 26-370) were included, with moderate to high quality scores. Low miR-31-3p expression was consistently associated with improved cetuximab outcomes. In the FIRE-3 trial, low miR-31-3p expressers demonstrated superior overall survival (HR: 0.61; P = 0.01), progression-free survival (HR: 0.74; P = 0.05), and overall response rate (OR: 4.0; P = 0.01) with cetuximab versus bevacizumab. The PROSPECT-C trial showed better response rates (58.3% vs. 22.2%; P = 0.029) and longer progression-free survival with low expression. Conversely, elevated miR-31 expression was associated with shorter progression-free survival. Notably, miR-31-3p did not predict anti-EGFR efficacy in right-sided tumors.

conclusionMiR-31-3p is a promising predictive biomarker for cetuximab response in RAS wild-type mCRC, with low expression consistently associated with improved outcomes. However, tumor sidedness may modulate its predictive value. Prospective validation studies with standardized assays are needed before clinical implementation. Integration of miR-31-3p with existing markers could help identify patients unlikely to benefit from anti-EGFR therapy.

Indexed as

BiomarkerCetuximabEGFR inhibitorMetastatic colorectal cancermiR-31Progression-free survival

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.