ArticleScientific reports2026
Towards trustworthy brain stroke diagnosis using a lightweight explainable deep learning framework for CT imaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain stroke occurs due to blockage or rupture in the cerebral blood supply and represents a critical medical emergency requiring rapid and accurate diagnosis. However, manual interpretation of CT scans is time-consuming and may delay clinical decision-making. To address this challenge, this study proposes the Deep Neural Brain Stroke Detection (DNBSD) system, a lightweight deep learning-based framework for automated stroke detection from CT images. The proposed model employs a task-specific convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture consisting of Conv2D, MaxPooling, Batch Normalization, Flatten and Dense layers, containing only 1.67 million trainable parameters and a computational complexity of 0.2973 GFLOPs, making it suitable for resource-constrained clinical environments. Additionally, preprocessing techniques including image resizing and normalization were applied to optimize performance. The model is trained and evaluated on two publicly available datasets: Brain Stroke CT Image Dataset (BSCI) and Brain Stroke Prediction CT Scan Image Dataset (BSPCSI), each divided into training, validation, and testing subsets. Experimental results demonstrate that the DNBSD system achieves high performance, with an accuracy of [Formula: see text] and an AUC of [Formula: see text] on the BSCI dataset, and an accuracy of [Formula: see text] with an AUC of [Formula: see text] on the BSPCSI dataset, while showing improved performance compared with several baseline approaches and state-of-the-art deep learning models. To enhance interpretability and support clinical decision-making, explainable artificial intelligence techniques, including LIME and Grad-CAM, are integrated to highlight critical regions influencing predictions. Additionally, a web-based diagnostic tool is developed to enable real-time stroke prediction. The findings suggest that the proposed approach can serve as an effective and interpretable tool for automated stroke detection, with potential to enhance clinical diagnostic workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.