Trial reportScientific reports2026
Effect of an electronic health record-integrated machine learning asthma risk marker on pediatrician prognostic accuracy during preschool age: a pilot randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05826561 (Developing a Childhood Asthma Risk Passive Digital Marker), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Developing a Childhood Asthma Risk Passive Digital Marker
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early identification of children at risk for persistent asthma is challenging because preschool respiratory symptoms are heterogeneous and often overlap with transient wheezing illnesses. Machine learning-based prediction models may improve risk stratification, but few have been integrated into electronic health record (EHR) systems or evaluated for their effect on clinician decision-making. We evaluated whether access to an EHR-integrated machine learning-based Passive Digital Marker (PDM) improved pediatrician prognostic accuracy for school-age asthma and assessed the tool's usability, acceptability, and feasibility. In this pilot randomized clinical trial, practicing pediatricians in Indiana were randomized using a Solomon 4-group design with pretest and posttest assessments. Pediatricians evaluated 10 standardized pediatric patient vignettes derived from longitudinal EHR data from birth through age 3 years. Children with documented asthma diagnoses between ages 6 and 11 years were classified as cases. The PDM classified children as high or low risk for persistent school-age asthma using routinely collected clinical data. The primary outcome was clinician prognostic accuracy, defined as the proportion of correctly classified vignettes;secondary outcomes included usability, acceptability, and feasibility. Thirty-four pediatricians participated, and all completed study procedures. Clinicians with access to the PDM demonstrated higher prognostic accuracy than clinicians without access (mean [95% CI] 0.83 [0.69-0.97] vs 0.61 [0.52-0.70]; P = .008). In a mixed-effects model accounting for clustering of vignette assessments within clinicians, a significant interaction between PDM access and assessment timing was observed (b = 0.10; 95% CI 0.01-0.18; P = .02), indicating improved prognostic accuracy during posttest assessments when clinicians used the PDM. In this pilot randomized clinical trial, an EHR-integrated machine learning-based asthma risk marker improved pediatrician prognostic accuracy and demonstrated favorable usability and feasibility. These findings support further evaluation of machine learning-enabled clinical decision support tools to improve early identification of children at risk for persistent asthma.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05826561; registered April 12, 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.