ReviewActa pharmacologica Sinica2026
Fibroblast growth factors in ischemic stroke: Therapeutic potential and clinical challenges.
Review in Acta pharmacologica Sinica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischemic stroke is a leading cause of global mortality and long-term disability, with limited therapeutic options. Increasing evidence from experimental studies suggests that fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) play important roles in regulating key biological processes involved in brain repair following ischemia. This review examines the existing evidence to understand the functional roles of FGFs in ischemic stroke, highlighting findings from in vivo and in vitro models, as well as outcomes from clinical investigations. FGFs contribute to neuroprotection by supporting neuronal survival, modulating inflammatory responses, preserving blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity, and enhancing angiogenesis. Despite promising data from experimental models, clinical translation of FGF-based therapies has proven challenging. Clinical trials have encountered issues such as safety concerns, particularly regarding optimal dosing and the risk of adverse effects, which complicates treatment response. These limitations highlight the complexity of translating FGF-based therapies into clinical practice in stroke treatment. Additionally, emerging FGF biomarkers may help predict therapeutic responses and guide patient selection and diagnosis. Future research should focus on optimizing delivery systems, identifying therapeutic windows, and improving clinical trial design, as successful clinical translation of FGF therapies relies on resolving subtype-specificity and refining delivery strategies to ensure targeted and effective treatment. Therefore, gaining a deeper understanding of the timing and context of FGF activity following ischemic stroke could pave the way for successful clinical applications, such as early neuroprotection, preservation of BBB integrity, and reduction of neuroinflammation. This understanding could also support the development of more targeted and effective interventions for ischemic stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42315909What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.