ArticleHuman brain mapping2026
Efficient Deep Learning Models for Predicting Individualized Task Activation From Resting-State Functional Connectivity.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Systematic Review.Current treatment options in psychiatry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning models have demonstrated the potential to predict task-evoked brain activation from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging, offering a pathway toward individualized brain mapping without requiring task-based data. In this study, we systematically evaluate architectural strategies for improving the efficiency and scalability of such models. Using data from the Human Connectome Project, we replicate the BrainSurfCNN framework and introduce two extensions: BrainSERF, which incorporates channel-wise attention through squeeze-and-excitation modules, and BrainSurfGCN, a graph-based model that leverages cortical mesh topology for efficient message passing. Across multiple evaluation metrics, including spatial correlation, Dice score, Dice AUC, and subject identification accuracy, all models achieve comparable predictive performance. Despite similar accuracy, the proposed models offer distinct advantages. BrainSERF provides modest improvements in capturing individual-specific features, while BrainSurfGCN achieves substantial reductions in model size and training time, highlighting a favorable trade-off between performance and computational efficiency. Beyond architectural comparisons, we investigate factors driving variability in prediction accuracy. We find that behavioral task performance, resting-state data quality, and inter-subject variability in task activation jointly constrain prediction fidelity. In particular, contrasts with lower signal reliability and higher variability exhibit reduced predictability across all models. Together, these findings demonstrate that incorporating topological and functional structural priors can improve the efficiency of deep learning models without sacrificing accuracy, while also emphasizing that prediction performance is fundamentally limited by the reliability of the underlying neural signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.