ArticleBMC psychiatry2026
Heart rate dynamics and antioxidant capacity under cognitive-emotional load in obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relationship between autonomic nervous system function, indexed by heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV), and the oxidant-antioxidant defense system in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) remains poorly understood. This study investigated the association between autonomic reactivity and salivary antioxidant capacity (AOC) in patients with OCD under cognitive-emotional load. Thirty-one patients with OCD and twenty-nine healthy controls (HC) underwent a cognitive-emotional antisaccade task. Saliva samples for AOC analysis and electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings were collected before and after the task. Participants were stratified into high- and low-HR subgroups based on baseline levels. The OCD group demonstrated significantly lower baseline AOC and a blunted AOC response to the task compared to HC, whose AOC increased significantly. Crucially, stratification by baseline HR revealed a physiologically distinct OCD subtype. OCD patients with low baseline HR exhibited a maladaptive profile, showing a decrease in AOC and a significant increase in normalized low-frequency power (LFnu). In contrast, OCD patients with high baseline HR showed an AOC increase comparable to that of healthy controls. Overall, the OCD group also demonstrated a more pronounced increase in very low-frequency power (VLF) and higher overall LFnu, indicating generalized sympathetic predominance. These findings point to a physiologically distinct OCD phenotype defined by low baseline HR, impaired antioxidant response, and sympathetic hyperreactivity under stress, and suggest that baseline HR may serve as a candidate biomarker of a more severe, maladaptive form of OCD with compromised compensatory mechanisms linking autonomic regulation and antioxidant defense. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.